|
Banned in the Middle
East: What does it take to get censored in Syria, anyway?
May 2nd, 2006
Written by Michael Atkinson
Because Syria does not have an authentic film industry of its own,
the native movies collected for this inspired Walter Reade retro
are (a) mostly crude third-world hardscrabble, or (b) often sourced
out of the politics and/or funding of neighboring nations, or (c)
both. Of course, the shadow of the Baathist regime, in place for
36 years and counting, looms—-but not in a dependably ideological
way. However secular, the government's Byzantine, and often simply
whimsical, web of censorship committees, gantlets, principles, and
feuds has no official code to follow, and suppression is applied
by secret censors when and if they see fit, a process that keeps
all culture production in a state of anxious exhaustion.
There is no deciphering why some films
are forbidden (and sometimes, years later, permitted), and why others
are not; Oussama Mohammad's seemingly harmless Stars in Broad
Daylight (1988) is still banned, although its tale of a doomed
double wedding in a mountain village was apparently objectionable
on the grounds that it depicted rural life in an interrogative way.
Visually boisterous and tableau-busy, the film belies Mohammad's
Moscow film school training, but it's medium potatoes beside his
second film, Sacrifices (2003). An eye-magnet orgy of impossible
perspectives, primal iconography, Living Theatre histrionics, inappropriate
fondlings (no Sharia law here), and eggs eggs eggs, Mohammad's seething
madness concerns itself with three interrelated families dug into
the clay of a mountainside, awaiting a patriarch's death and living
out every human impulse as if it were the brave cast's last will
and testament. What does it take to get censored, anyway?
The nonfiction films on view are, unsurprisingly, more overtly political:
Mohammad Malas's The Dream (1981) rather beautifully records
Palestinian refugees recounting their dreams—most of which
are matters of nationhood, desire, and hope. (An unknown percentage
of the film's witnesses were later killed in the 1982 massacre at
Sabra and Shatila, led by the Israeli-directed Lebanese Christian
forces.) Famed documentarian Omar Amiralay began as a pro-modernization
advocate, with Film- Essay on the Euphrates Dam (1970);
33 years later, with A Flood in Baath Country (2003), he
confronts his own naïveté and lets the Syrians displaced
by the dam's misengineered boondoggle speak for themselves.
In the meantime, Amiralay's Everyday
Life in a Syrian Village (1974) and The Chickens (1977),
both unblinking analyses of institutional poverty, are still cinema
non grata in his homeland. It's hard to forecast the possible futures
of Hala Mohammad's Journey Into Memory (2006), which consists
entirely of a road trip to the Palmyra prison in an SUV with three
middle- aged Syrian writers, who recount in poetic detail the many
inexplicable years they spent there as convicts of culture.
|